Re: [PATCH] memcg: Fix memcg_kmem_bypass() for remote memcg charging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020/5/13 17:05, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 13-05-20 15:28:28, Li Zefan wrote:
>> While trying to use remote memcg charging in an out-of-tree kernel module
>> I found it's not working, because the current thread is a workqueue thread.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> No need to queue this for v5.7 as currently no upstream users of this memcg
>> feature suffer from this bug.
>>
>> ---
>>  mm/memcontrol.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> index a3b97f1..db836fc 100644
>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> @@ -2802,6 +2802,8 @@ static void memcg_schedule_kmem_cache_create(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>>  
>>  static inline bool memcg_kmem_bypass(void)
>>  {
>> +	if (unlikely(current->active_memcg))
>> +		return false;
> 
> I am confused. Why the check below is insufficient? It checks for both mm
> and PF_KTHREAD?
> 

memalloc_use_memcg(memcg);
alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
memalloc_unuse_memcg();

If we run above code in a workqueue thread the memory won't be charged to the specific
memcg, because memcg_kmem_bypass() returns true in this case.

>>  	if (in_interrupt() || !current->mm || (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
>>  		return true;
>>  	return false;



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux