On 03/19/20 15:45, Josh Don wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 4:35 AM Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 03/17/20 14:35, Josh Don wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 7:05 AM Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > It might be a good idea to split the API from the user too. > > > > > > Not sure what you mean by this, could you clarify? > > > > I meant it'd be a good idea to split the cpumask API into its own patch and > > have a separate patch for the user in sched/core.c. But that was a small nit. > > If the user (in sched/core.c) somehow introduces a regression, reverting it > > separately should be trivial. > > > > Thanks > > Ah, yes I agree that sounds like a good idea, I can do that. > > Peter, any other nit before I re-send? AFAICT it was already picked up, so no need to resend to fix the nits from my side. -- Qais Yousef
