On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 13:15 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (20/03/07 19:54), Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-03-08 at 12:18 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > On (20/03/06 23:58), Joe Perches wrote:
> > > [..]
> > > > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > > > @@ -907,7 +907,6 @@ static void get_policy_nodemask(struct mempolicy *p, nodemask_t *nodes)
> > > >
> > > > switch (p->mode) {
> > > > case MPOL_BIND:
> > > > - /* Fall through */
> > > > case MPOL_INTERLEAVE:
> >
> > Consecutive case labels do not need an interleaving fallthrough;
> >
> > ie: ditto
>
> I see. Shall this be mentioned in the commit message, maybe?
<shrug, maybe> I've no real opinion about that necessity.
fallthrough commments are relatively rarely used as a
separating element between case labels.
It's by far most common to just have consecutive case labels
without any other content.
It's somewhere between 500:1 to 1000:1 in the kernel.
