Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: asynchronous reclaim for memory.high

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 01:45:45PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> The setup cost can be lazy optimized but it'd still have to bounce the
> tiny pieces of work to different threads instead of processing them in
> one fell swoop from the same context, which most likely is gonna be
> untenably expensive.

I see, your last mail is clearer now.  If it's easy to do, a pointer to where
this happens would help so we're on the same page.

thanks,
Daniel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux