Re: [PATCH v2 2/2 RESEND] cgroup: cgroup_procs_next should increase position index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Vasily Averin <vvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2 RESEND] cgroup: cgroup_procs_next should increase position index
From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 17:00:22 -0500
Cc: cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Li Zefan <lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Koutný <mkoutny@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <821bde4f-bdaf-994c-d864-a8a97d7d6b13@virtuozzo.com>
References: <20200128172737.GA21791@blackbody.suse.cz> <821bde4f-bdaf-994c-d864-a8a97d7d6b13@virtuozzo.com>

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 01:34:59PM +0300, Vasily Averin wrote:
> If seq_file .next fuction does not change position index,
> read after some lseek can generate unexpected output:

Applied 1-2 to cgroup/for-5.6-fixes.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

References:
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] cgroup: seq_file .next functions should increase position index
  - From: Michal Koutný
- [PATCH v2 2/2 RESEND] cgroup: cgroup_procs_next should increase position index
  - From: Vasily Averin

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] cpuset: Make cpuset hotplug synchronous
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] cgroup: Iterate tasks that did not finish do_exit()
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 2/2 RESEND] cgroup: cgroup_procs_next should increase position index
Next by thread: [PATCH 2/2] cgroup_procs_next should increase position index
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API] [Monitors]

Powered by Linux