This is probably the only patch in series I can understand ;) To me it looks like a good cleanup regardless, but On 01/17, Christian Brauner wrote: > > The patch just passes in the parent task_struct For what? "parent" is always "current", no? Oleg.
This is probably the only patch in series I can understand ;) To me it looks like a good cleanup regardless, but On 01/17, Christian Brauner wrote: > > The patch just passes in the parent task_struct For what? "parent" is always "current", no? Oleg.
|