Re: [PATCH RFC v4 02/16] cgroup: Introduce cgroup for drm subsystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 10:31 AM Michal Koutný <mkoutny@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 02:05:19AM -0400, Kenny Ho <Kenny.Ho@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +struct cgroup_subsys drm_cgrp_subsys = {
> > +     .css_alloc      = drmcg_css_alloc,
> > +     .css_free       = drmcg_css_free,
> > +     .early_init     = false,
> > +     .legacy_cftypes = files,
> Do you really want to expose the DRM controller on v1 hierarchies (where
> threads of one process can be in different cgroups, or children cgroups
> compete with their parents)?

(Sorry for the delay, I have been distracted by something else.)
Yes, I am hoping to make the functionality as widely available as
possible since the ecosystem is still transitioning to v2.  Do you see
inherent problem with this approach?

Regards,
Kenny


>
> > +     .dfl_cftypes    = files,
> > +};
>
> Just asking,
> Michal




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux