在 2019/11/16 下午2:28, Shakeel Butt 写道: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 7:15 PM Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Currently memcg still use per node pgdat->lru_lock to guard its lruvec. >> That causes some lru_lock contention in a high container density system. >> >> If we can use per lruvec lock, that could relief much of the lru_lock >> contention. >> >> The later patches will replace the pgdat->lru_lock with lruvec->lru_lock >> and show the performance benefit by benchmarks. > > Merge this patch with actual usage. No need to have a separate patch. Thanks for comment, Shakeel! Yes, but considering the 3rd, huge and un-splitable patch of actully replacing, I'd rather to pull sth out from it. Ty to make patches a bit more readable, Do you think so? Thanks Alex
