On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 02:50:01AM +1100, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> Because pids->limit can be changed concurrently (but we don't want to
> take a lock because it would be needlessly expensive), use atomic64_ts
> instead.
>
> Fixes: commit 49b786ea146f ("cgroup: implement the PIDs subsystem")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v4.3+
> Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Applied to cgroup/for-5.5.
Thanks.
--
tejun
