Re: lot of MemAvailable but falling cache and raising PSI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Michal,

now the kernel (5.2.14) was locked / deadlocked with:
---------------
019-09-12 12:41:47     ------------[ cut here ]------------
2019-09-12 12:41:47     NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (igb): transmit queue 2
timed out
2019-09-12 12:41:47     WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 0 at
net/sched/sch_generic.c:443 dev_watchdog+0x254/0x260
2019-09-12 12:41:47     Modules linked in: btrfs dm_mod netconsole
xt_tcpudp xt_owner xt_conntrack nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6
nf_defrag_ipv4 fuse xt_multiport ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_set
iptable_filter bpfilter ip_set_hash_net ip_set nfnetlink 8021q garp
bonding sb_edac x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp kvm_intel ast ttm kvm
drm_kms_helper irqbypass drm crc32_pclmul fb_sys_fops lpc_ich ipmi_si
syscopyarea sysfillrect ipmi_devintf mfd_core ghash_clmulni_intel wmi
sysimgblt sg ipmi_msghandler button ip_tables x_tables zstd_decompress
zstd_compress raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq
async_xor async_tx xor usbhid raid6_pq raid1 raid0 multipath linear
md_mod xhci_pci sd_mod ehci_pci xhci_hcd ehci_hcd igb i2c_i801
i2c_algo_bit ahci usbcore ptp libahci i2c_core usb_common pps_core
megaraid_sas [last unloaded: btrfs]
2019-09-12 12:41:47     CPU: 2 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Not tainted 5.2.14 #1
2019-09-12 12:41:47     Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X10SRi-F,
BIOS 1.0b 04/21/2015
2019-09-12 12:41:47     RIP: 0010:dev_watchdog+0x254/0x260
2019-09-12 12:41:47     Code: 48 85 c0 75 e4 eb 9d 4c 89 ef c6 05 a6 09
c8 00 01 e8 b0 53 fb ff 89 d9 48 89 c2 4c 89 ee 48 c7 c7 10 d6 0c be e8
ac ca 98 ff <0f> 0b e9 7c ff ff ff 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 57
41 56 49
2019-09-12 12:41:47     RSP: 0018:ffffbea7c63a0e68 EFLAGS: 00010282
2019-09-12 12:41:47     RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX:
0000000000000006
2019-09-12 12:41:47     RDX: 0000000000000007 RSI: 0000000000000086 RDI:
ffff96f9ff896540
2019-09-12 12:41:47     RBP: ffff96f9fc18041c R08: 0000000000000001 R09:
000000000000046f
2019-09-12 12:41:47     R10: ffff96f9ff89a630 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:
ffff96f9f9e16940
2019-09-12 12:41:47     R13: ffff96f9fc180000 R14: ffff96f9fc180440 R15:
0000000000000008
2019-09-12 12:41:47     FS: 0000000000000000(0000)
GS:ffff96f9ff880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
2019-09-12 12:41:47     CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
2019-09-12 12:41:47     CR2: 00007fbb2c4e2000 CR3: 0000000c0d20a004 CR4:
00000000001606e0
2019-09-12 12:41:47     Call Trace:<IRQ>
2019-09-12 12:41:47     ?
pfifo_fast_reset+0x110/0x110call_timer_fn+0x2d/0x140run_timer_softirq+0x1e2/0x440
2019-09-12 12:41:47     ? timerqueue_add+0x54/0x80
2019-09-12 12:41:48     ?
enqueue_hrtimer+0x3a/0x90__do_softirq+0x10c/0x2d4irq_exit+0xdd/0xf0smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x74/0x130apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20</IRQ>
2019-09-12 12:41:48     RIP: 0010:cpuidle_enter_state+0xbd/0x410
2019-09-12 12:41:48     Code: 24 0f 1f 44 00 00 31 ff e8 b0 67 a5 ff 80
7c 24 13 00 74 12 9c 58 f6 c4 02 0f 85 2c 03 00 00 31 ff e8 a7 b9 aa ff
fb 45 85 ed <0f> 88 e0 02 00 00 4c 8b 04 24 4c 2b 44 24 08 48 ba cf f7
53 e3 a5
2019-09-12 12:41:48     RSP: 0018:ffffbea7c62f7e60 EFLAGS: 00000202
ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13
2019-09-12 12:41:48     RAX: ffff96f9ff8a9840 RBX: ffffffffbe3271a0 RCX:
000000000000001f
2019-09-12 12:41:48     RDX: 000044a065c471eb RSI: 0000000024925419 RDI:
0000000000000000
2019-09-12 12:41:48     RBP: ffffdea7bfa80f00 R08: 0000000000000002 R09:
00000000000290c0
2019-09-12 12:41:48     R10: 00000000ffffffff R11: 0000000000000f05 R12:
0000000000000004
2019-09-12 12:41:48     R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000004 R15:
ffffffffbe3271a0cpuidle_enter+0x29/0x40do_idle+0x1d5/0x220cpu_startup_entry+0x19/0x20start_secondary+0x16b/0x1b0secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
2019-09-12 12:41:48     ---[ end trace 3241d99856ac4582 ]---
2019-09-12 12:41:48     igb 0000:05:00.0 eth0: Reset adapter
-------------------------------

Stefan
Am 11.09.19 um 15:59 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
> HI,
> 
> i've now tried v5.2.14 but that one died with - i don't know which
> version to try... now
> 
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     ------------[ cut here ]------------
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:2655!
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     CPU: 4 PID: 466 Comm: kworker/u24:6 Not tainted
> 5.2.14 #1
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X10SRi-F,
> BIOS 1.0b 04/21/2015
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     Workqueue: btrfs-delalloc btrfs_delalloc_helper
> [btrfs]
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     RIP: 0010:clear_page_dirty_for_io+0xfc/0x210
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     Code: 01 48 0f 44 d3 f0 48 0f ba 32 03 b8 00 00
> 00 00 72 1a 4d 85 e4 0f 85 b4 00 00 00 48 83 c4 08 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41
> 5e 41 5f c3 <0f> 0b 9c 41 5f fa 48 8b 03 48 8b 53 38 48 c1 e8 36 48 85
> d2 48 8b
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     RSP: 0018:ffffbd4b8d2f3c18 EFLAGS: 00010246
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     RAX: 001000000004205c RBX: ffffe660525b3140 RCX:
> 0000000000000000
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000006 RDI:
> ffffe660525b3140
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     RBP: ffff9ad639868818 R08: 0000000000000001 R09:
> 000000000002de18
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     R10: 0000000000000002 R11: ffff9ade7ffd6000 R12:
> 0000000000000000
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
> ffffbd4b8d2f3d08
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     FS: 0000000000000000(0000)
> GS:ffff9ade3f900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     CR2: 000055fa10d2bf70 CR3: 00000005a420a002 CR4:
> 00000000001606e0
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     Call Trace:
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     __process_pages_contig+0x270/0x360 [btrfs]
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     submit_compressed_extents+0x39d/0x460 [btrfs]
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     normal_work_helper+0x20f/0x320
> [btrfs]process_one_work+0x18b/0x380worker_thread+0x4f/0x3a0
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     ? rescuer_thread+0x330/0x330kthread+0xf8/0x130
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     ?
> kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     Modules linked in: netconsole xt_tcpudp xt_owner
> xt_conntrack nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_multiport
> ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_set iptable_filter bpfilter fuse
> ip_set_hash_net ip_set nfnetlink 8021q garp bonding sb_edac
> x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp kvm_intel ast kvm ttm drm_kms_helper
> irqbypass crc32_pclmul drm fb_sys_fops syscopyarea lpc_ich sysfillrect
> ghash_clmulni_intel sysimgblt mfd_core sg wmi ipmi_si ipmi_devintf
> ipmi_msghandler button ip_tables x_tables btrfs zstd_decompress
> zstd_compress raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq
> async_xor async_tx xor usbhid raid6_pq raid1 raid0 multipath linear
> md_mod sd_mod xhci_pci ehci_pci igb xhci_hcd ehci_hcd i2c_algo_bit
> i2c_i801 ahci ptp i2c_core usbcore libahci usb_common pps_core megaraid_sas
> 2019-09-11 15:41:09     ---[ end trace d9a3f99c047dc8bf ]---
> 2019-09-11 15:41:10     RIP: 0010:clear_page_dirty_for_io+0xfc/0x210
> 2019-09-11 15:41:10     Code: 01 48 0f 44 d3 f0 48 0f ba 32 03 b8 00 00
> 00 00 72 1a 4d 85 e4 0f 85 b4 00 00 00 48 83 c4 08 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41
> 5e 41 5f c3 <0f> 0b 9c 41 5f fa 48 8b 03 48 8b 53 38 48 c1 e8 36 48 85
> d2 48 8b
> 2019-09-11 15:41:10     RSP: 0018:ffffbd4b8d2f3c18 EFLAGS: 00010246
> 2019-09-11 15:41:10     RAX: 001000000004205c RBX: ffffe660525b3140 RCX:
> 0000000000000000
> 2019-09-11 15:41:10     RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000006 RDI:
> ffffe660525b3140
> 2019-09-11 15:41:10     RBP: ffff9ad639868818 R08: 0000000000000001 R09:
> 000000000002de18
> 2019-09-11 15:41:10     R10: 0000000000000002 R11: ffff9ade7ffd6000 R12:
> 0000000000000000
> 2019-09-11 15:41:10     R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
> ffffbd4b8d2f3d08
> 2019-09-11 15:41:10     FS: 0000000000000000(0000)
> GS:ffff9ade3f900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> 2019-09-11 15:41:10     CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> 2019-09-11 15:41:10     CR2: 000055fa10d2bf70 CR3: 00000005a420a002 CR4:
> 00000000001606e0
> 2019-09-11 15:41:10     Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
> 2019-09-11 15:41:10     Kernel Offset: 0x1a000000 from
> 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff)
> 2019-09-11 15:41:10     Rebooting in 20 seconds..
> 2019-09-11 15:41:29     ACPI MEMORY or I/O RESET_REG.
> 
> Stefan
> Am 11.09.19 um 08:24 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
>> Hi Michal,
>>
>> Am 11.09.19 um 08:12 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
>>> Hi Michal,
>>> Am 10.09.19 um 15:24 schrieb Michal Hocko:
>>>> On Tue 10-09-19 15:14:45, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>>>>> Am 10.09.19 um 15:05 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 10.09.19 um 14:57 schrieb Michal Hocko:
>>>>>>> On Tue 10-09-19 14:45:37, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hello Michal,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ok this might take a long time. Attached you'll find a graph from a
>>>>>>>> fresh boot what happens over time (here 17 August to 30 August). Memory
>>>>>>>> Usage decreases as well as cache but slowly and only over time and days.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So it might take 2-3 weeks running Kernel 5.3 to see what happens.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No problem. Just make sure to collect the requested data from the time
>>>>>>> you see the actual problem. Btw. you try my very dumb scriplets to get
>>>>>>> an idea of how much memory gets reclaimed due to THP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You mean your sed and sort on top of the trace file? No i did not with
>>>>>> the current 5.3 kernel do you think it will show anything interesting?
>>>>>> Which line shows me how much memory gets reclaimed due to THP?
>>>>
>>>> Please re-read http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190910082919.GL2063@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Each command has a commented output. If you see nunmber of reclaimed
>>>> pages to be large for GFP_TRANSHUGE then you are seeing a similar
>>>> problem.
>>>>
>>>>> Is something like a kernel memory leak possible? Or wouldn't this end up
>>>>> in having a lot of free memory which doesn't seem usable.
>>>>
>>>> I would be really surprised if this was the case.
>>>>
>>>>> I also wonder why a reclaim takes place when there is enough memory.
>>>>
>>>> This is not clear yet and it might be a bug that has been fixed since
>>>> 4.18. That's why we need to see whether the same is pattern is happening
>>>> with 5.3 as well.
>>
>> but except from the btrfs problem the memory consumption looks far
>> better than before.
>>
>> Running 4.19.X:
>> after about 12h cache starts to drop from 30G to 24G
>>
>> Running 5.3-rc8:
>> after about 24h cache is still constant at nearly 30G
>>
>> Greets,
>> Stefan
>>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux