Hi Jens, now that BFQ's weight interface has been fixed [1], can we proceed with this change? In addition to acking this solution, in [2] Tejun already suggested a reduced version of the present patch. In Tejun's version, only bfq.weight is changed. But I guess that legacy code may use also some of the other bfq parameters in cgroups, without the bfq prefix. Apart from that, any version is ok for me, provided that it solves the current confusing situation for userspace [3]. Thanks, Paolo [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/27/1716 [2] https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg35823.html [3] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/7057 Angelo Ruocco (1): block, bfq: delete "bfq" prefix from cgroup filenames block/bfq-cgroup.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) -- 2.20.1
