On 8/6/19 10:07 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 02-08-19 13:44:38, Michal Hocko wrote: [...]diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index ba9138a4a1de..53a35c526e43 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -2429,8 +2429,12 @@ static int try_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask, schedule_work(&memcg->high_work); break; } - current->memcg_nr_pages_over_high += batch; - set_notify_resume(current); + if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp_mask)) { + reclaim_high(memcg, nr_pages, GFP_KERNEL);ups, this should be s@GFP_KERNEL@gfp_mask@+ } else { + current->memcg_nr_pages_over_high += batch; + set_notify_resume(current); + } break; } } while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)));Should I send an official patch for this?
I prefer to keep it as is while we have no better solution.
