The clamp values are not tunable at the level of the root task group.
That's for two main reasons:
- the root group represents "system resources" which are always
entirely available from the cgroup standpoint.
- when tuning/restricting "system resources" makes sense, tuning must
be done using a system wide API which should also be available when
control groups are not.
When a system wide restriction is available, cgroups should be aware of
its value in order to know exactly how much "system resources" are
available for the subgroups.
Utilization clamping supports already the concepts of:
- system defaults: which define the maximum possible clamp values
usable by tasks.
- effective clamps: which allows a parent cgroup to constraint (maybe
temporarily) its descendants without losing the information related
to the values "requested" from them.
Exploit these two concepts and bind them together in such a way that,
whenever system default are tuned, the new values are propagated to
(possibly) restrict or relax the "effective" value of nested cgroups.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v12:
Message-ID: <20190716143417.us3xhksrsaxsl2ok@e110439-lin>
- add missing RCU read locks across cpu_util_update_eff() call from
uclamp_update_root_tg()
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 08f5a0c205c6..e9231b089d5c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1017,10 +1017,30 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_dec(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
uclamp_rq_dec_id(rq, p, clamp_id);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK_GROUP
+static void cpu_util_update_eff(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css);
+static void uclamp_update_root_tg(void)
+{
+ struct task_group *tg = &root_task_group;
+
+ uclamp_se_set(&tg->uclamp_req[UCLAMP_MIN],
+ sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min, false);
+ uclamp_se_set(&tg->uclamp_req[UCLAMP_MAX],
+ sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max, false);
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ cpu_util_update_eff(&root_task_group.css);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+#else
+static void uclamp_update_root_tg(void) { }
+#endif
+
int sysctl_sched_uclamp_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
loff_t *ppos)
{
+ bool update_root_tg = false;
int old_min, old_max;
int result;
@@ -1043,12 +1063,17 @@ int sysctl_sched_uclamp_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
if (old_min != sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min) {
uclamp_se_set(&uclamp_default[UCLAMP_MIN],
sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min, false);
+ update_root_tg = true;
}
if (old_max != sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max) {
uclamp_se_set(&uclamp_default[UCLAMP_MAX],
sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max, false);
+ update_root_tg = true;
}
+ if (update_root_tg)
+ uclamp_update_root_tg();
+
/*
* Updating all the RUNNABLE task is expensive, keep it simple and do
* just a lazy update at each next enqueue time.
--
2.22.0
