Re: [PATCH] cgroup: add a new group controller for cephfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Hmmm... io.latency works only if the IOs pass through a request_queue.
> Given the transport is network, would it make more sense to control
> from network side?

Hi, tejun:-)

I think, since we are offering users an interface to control the io
reqs issuing rate, we'd better provide the interface through the io
controller, is this right?

Actually, for now, we are considering implement a ceph-specific
"blkcg_policy" which adds new io controller "cf" files to let users
modify configurations of the ceph-specific "blkcg_policy" and limit
the ceph reqs sent to the underlying cluster all by itself rather than
relying on the existing blkcg_policies like io latency or io throttle.
Is this the right way to go? Thanks:-)
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux