Hello, Shakeel. On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 07:59:33AM -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote: > Why not make this configurable at the delegation boundary? As you > mentioned, there are jobs who want centralized workload manager to > watch over their subtrees while there can be jobs which want to > monitor their subtree themselves. For example I can have a job which > know how to act when one of the children cgroup goes OOM. However if > the root of that job goes OOM then the centralized workload manager > should do something about it. With this change, how to implement this > scenario? How will the central manager differentiates between that a > subtree of a job goes OOM or the root of that job? I guess from the > discussion it seems like the centralized manager has to traverse that > job's subtree to find the source of OOM. > > Why can't we let the implementation of centralized manager easier by > allowing to configure the propagation of these notifications across > delegation boundary. I think the right way to achieve the above would be having separate recursive and local counters. Thanks. -- tejun
