Re: [PATCH v2] block: fix iolat timestamp and restore accounting semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 12:48:11PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 12/11/18 4:01 PM, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> > The blk-iolatency controller measures the time from rq_qos_throttle() to
> > rq_qos_done_bio() and attributes this time to the first bio that needs
> > to create the request. This means if a bio is plug-mergeable or
> > bio-mergeable, it gets to bypass the blk-iolatency controller.
> > 
> > The recent series, to tag all bios w/ blkgs in [1] changed the timing
> > incorrectly as well. First, the iolatency controller was tagging bios
> > and using that information if it should process it in rq_qos_done_bio().
> > However, now that all bios are tagged, this caused the atomic_t for the
> > struct rq_wait inflight count to underflow resulting in a stall. Second,
> > now the timing was using the duration a bio from generic_make_request()
> > rather than the timing mentioned above.
> > 
> > This patch fixes these issues by reusing the BLK_QUEUE_ENTERED flag to
> > determine if a bio has entered the request layer and is responsible for
> > starting a request. Stacked drivers don't recurse through
> > blk_mq_make_request(), so the overhead of using time between
> > generic_make_request() and the blk_mq_get_request() should be minimal.
> > blk-iolatency now checks if this flag is set to determine if it should
> > process the bio in rq_qos_done_bio().
> 
> I'm having a hard time convincing myself that this is correct... Maybe
> we should just add a new flag for this specific use case? Or feel free
> to convince me otherwise.
>

I mean it'll work for now, but then when somebody else wants to do something
similar *cough*io.weight*cough* it'll need a new flag.  I kind of hate adding a
new flag for every controller, but then again it's not like there's thousands of
these things.  I'm having a hard time coming up with a solution other than a
per-tracker flag.  As for this specific version, I still think it needs to be in
iolatency itself, trying to make it generic just means it'll get fucked up again
later down the line.  Thanks,

Josef 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux