Hello, Paolo. On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 07:23:24PM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote: > > Then we understood that exactly the same happens with throttling, in > > case the latter is activated on different devices w.r.t. bfq. > > > > In addition, the same may happen, in the near future, with the > > bandwidth controller Josef is working on. If the controller can be > > configured per device, as with throttling, then statistics may differ, > > for the same interface files, between bfq, throttling and that > > controller. So, regardless of how all these are implemented, what's presented to user should be consistent and clear. There's no other way around it. Only what's relevant should be visible to userspace. > have you had time to look into this? Any improvement to this > interface is ok for us. We are only interested in finally solving this > interface issue, as, for what concerns us directly, it has been > preventing legacy code to use bfq for years. Unfortunately, I don't have any implementation proposal, but we can't show things this way to userspace. Thanks. -- tejun
