On 07/20/2018 01:09 PM, Waiman Long wrote: > On 07/20/2018 12:37 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:19:29PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >>> I am not against the idea of making it hierarchical eventually. I am >>> just hoping to get thing going by merging the patchset in its current >>> form and then we can make it hierarchical in a followup patch. >> Where's the rush? Why can't we do this right in one go? > For me, the rush comes from RHEL8 as it is a goal to have a fully > functioning cgroup v2 in that release. > > I also believe that most of the use cases of partition can be satisfied > with partitions at the first level children. Getting hierarchical > partition right may drag on for half a year, maybe, giving our history > with cpu v2 controller. No matter what we do to enable hierarchical > partition in the future, the current model of using a partition flag is > intuitive enough that it won't be changed at least for the first level > children. Peter, are you OK that or do you still want to have hierarchical partition done before submission? Thanks, Longman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
