Hello, Peter. Sorry about late reply. On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 06:38:26PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Yeah, for cpuset, it's messier, but it isn't different from hotunplug > > scenario, right? I think the best we can do there is putting ancestor > > operation on an equal footing as hotplug ops. > > Right, but hotplug is exceedingly rare, while I get the impression you > think it is perfectly fine to recind on your resource grants. Well, yeah, for a trivial example, imagine dynamic workload management where you wanna restrict what a side-loaded batch workload can do on and off peak hours. All other controllers can do that. It'd be a really odd design trade-off if we make that really clumsy for cpuset especially given that we wouldn't be gaining any actual functionalities. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
