On 2018-03-26 10:12 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, John.
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 01:05:50PM +0800, yuankuiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
as a bool, __cpuset_node_allowed(...) return should be bool.
So, as a minor cleanup patch, this is fine but can you please soften
the commit title / description a bit? It doesn't have to be bool.
int is fine. bool may be marginally more readable but that's about
it, so let's please make the commit match that.
[ZJ] On summary, update it as below:
From 6fd65547d4c704d86fd98cac1d9b8c74c8bee879 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Zhao <yuankuiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 13:01:32 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] cgroup: allowed of __cpuset_node_allowed to be bool
makes variable allowed returned by the __cpuset_node_allowed(...)
to be bool as it is assigned by the test_bits which always
return 0 or 1. In addition, it could save the size from
typical 4 bytes to 1 byte only. In another side, it could
save the potiential unnecessary instructionis during type conversion.
Signed-off-by: John Zhao <yuankuiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index b42037e..42338b7 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -2552,7 +2552,7 @@ static struct cpuset
*nearest_hardwall_ancestor(struct cpuset *cs)
bool __cpuset_node_allowed(int node, gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
struct cpuset *cs; /* current cpuset ancestors */
- int allowed; /* is allocation in zone z allowed? */
+ bool allowed; /* is allocation in zone z allowed? */
unsigned long flags;
if (in_interrupt())
--
2.7.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
