Hello Tejun, On 01/10/2018 11:14 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Michael. > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:01:11PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >>>>>> Can you please confirm that it's only necessary to delegate this file >>>>>> if we are delegating a threaded subtree? >>>>> >>>>> Replied on the other thread. The file isn't delegatable as far as I >>>>> can tell. >>>> >>>> So, following on from the discussion in the other thread, my >>>> question above still stands. >>> >>> Oh, I frankly haven't thought about delegating a threaded subtree. >> >> I'm still confused. cgroup-v2.txt documents the possibility. You >> wrote that text. We just had a conversation in another thread about the >> fact that cgroup.threads is delegatable. You must have thought at >> least a little about this? > > Oh, I'm probably mixing up two things. > > 1. When delegating, cgroup.threads should be delegated. Doing that > selectively doesn't achieve anything meaningful. Understood. But surely delegating cgroup.threads is effectively meaningless when delegating a "domain" cgroup tree? (Obviously it's not harmful to delegate the the cgroup.threads file in this case; it's just not useful to do so.) > 2. I haven't thought much about delegating a sub-protion of a threaded > subtree. Everything works the same way. I just can't think of a > use case. Ahhh -- now I see what you meant before. Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
