Re: cgroups(7): documenting /sys/kernel/cgroup files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, again.

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 09:33:40AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Michael.
> 
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 06:31:20PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> > So, I am confused. According to Documentation/cgroup-v2.txt,
> > cgoup.threads is delegated:
> > 
> > [[
> > Model of Delegation
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > 
> > A cgroup can be delegated in two ways.  First, to a less privileged
> > user by granting write access of the directory and its "cgroup.procs",
> > "cgroup.threads" and "cgroup.subtree_control" files to the user.
> > Second, if the "nsdelegate" mount option is set, automatically to a
> > cgroup namespace on namespace creation.
> > ]]
> > 
> > So, is that a mistake in that text file?
> 
> Yes, it is.  I probably copy&pasted from an earlier version where we
> were marking threaded domains instead of threaded roots.  Will fix it
> right away.

Jesus christ, sorry.  Roman and the document are right.

* cgroup.type is not delegatble, marking it threaded makes the cgroup
  join the parent's domain.

* cgroup.threads is delegatable, because marking the child cgroups as
  threaded make them join the subtree root, and the threads can be
  dispersed across the parent - the delegated root here - and the
  subtree of the child which is marked threaded.

I'll apply Roman's patch.  Sorry about the confusion.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux