Hello, Prateek. On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 01:20:46PM +0530, Prateek Sood wrote: > This change makes the usage of cpuset_hotplug_workfn() from cpu > hotplug path synchronous. For memory hotplug it still remains > asynchronous. Ah, right. > Memory migration happening from cpuset_hotplug_workfn() is > already asynchronous by queuing cpuset_migrate_mm_workfn() in > cpuset_migrate_mm_wq. > > cpuset_hotplug_workfn() > cpuset_hotplug_workfn(() > cpuset_migrate_mm() > queue_work(cpuset_migrate_mm_wq) > > It seems that memory migration latency might not have > impact with this change. > > Please let me know if you meant something else by cpuset > migration taking time when memory migration is turned on. No, I didn't. I was just confused about which part became synchronous. So, I don't have anything against making the cpu part synchronous, but let's not do that as the fix to the deadlocks cuz, while we can avoid them by changing cpuset, I don't think cpuset is the root cause for them. If there are benefits to making cpuset cpu migration synchronous, let's do that for those benefits. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html