On Tue 12-12-17 08:38:30, Tejun Heo wrote: > sync_inodes_sb() can race against cgwb (cgroup writeback) membership > switches and fail to writeback some inodes. For example, if an inode > switches to another wb while sync_inodes_sb() is in progress, the new > wb might not be visible to bdi_split_work_to_wbs() at all or the inode > might jump from a wb which hasn't issued writebacks yet to one which > already has. > > This patch adds backing_dev_info->wb_switch_rwsem to synchronize cgwb > switch path against sync_inodes_sb() so that sync_inodes_sb() is > guaranteed to see all the target wbs and inodes can't jump wbs to > escape syncing. > > v2: Fixed misplaced rwsem init. Spotted by Jiufei. OK, but this effectively prevents writeback from sync_inodes_sb() to ever make inode switch wbs. Cannot that be abused in some way like making sure writeback of our memcg is "invisible" by forcing it out using sync(2)? It just looks a bit dangerous to me... Honza > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reported-by: Jiufei Xue <xuejiufei@xxxxxxxxx> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/dc694ae2-f07f-61e1-7097-7c8411cee12d@xxxxxxxxx > --- > fs/fs-writeback.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h | 1 > mm/backing-dev.c | 1 > 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c > +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c > @@ -331,11 +331,22 @@ struct inode_switch_wbs_context { > struct work_struct work; > }; > > +static void bdi_down_write_wb_switch_rwsem(struct backing_dev_info *bdi) > +{ > + down_write(&bdi->wb_switch_rwsem); > +} > + > +static void bdi_up_write_wb_switch_rwsem(struct backing_dev_info *bdi) > +{ > + up_write(&bdi->wb_switch_rwsem); > +} > + > static void inode_switch_wbs_work_fn(struct work_struct *work) > { > struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw = > container_of(work, struct inode_switch_wbs_context, work); > struct inode *inode = isw->inode; > + struct backing_dev_info *bdi = inode_to_bdi(inode); > struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping; > struct bdi_writeback *old_wb = inode->i_wb; > struct bdi_writeback *new_wb = isw->new_wb; > @@ -344,6 +355,12 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs_work_fn(str > void **slot; > > /* > + * If @inode switches cgwb membership while sync_inodes_sb() is > + * being issued, sync_inodes_sb() might miss it. Synchronize. > + */ > + down_read(&bdi->wb_switch_rwsem); > + > + /* > * By the time control reaches here, RCU grace period has passed > * since I_WB_SWITCH assertion and all wb stat update transactions > * between unlocked_inode_to_wb_begin/end() are guaranteed to be > @@ -435,6 +452,8 @@ skip_switch: > spin_unlock(&new_wb->list_lock); > spin_unlock(&old_wb->list_lock); > > + up_read(&bdi->wb_switch_rwsem); > + > if (switched) { > wb_wakeup(new_wb); > wb_put(old_wb); > @@ -475,9 +494,18 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs(struct inod > if (inode->i_state & I_WB_SWITCH) > return; > > + /* > + * Avoid starting new switches while sync_inodes_sb() is in > + * progress. Otherwise, if the down_write protected issue path > + * blocks heavily, we might end up starting a large number of > + * switches which will block on the rwsem. > + */ > + if (!down_read_trylock(&bdi->wb_switch_rwsem)) > + return; > + > isw = kzalloc(sizeof(*isw), GFP_ATOMIC); > if (!isw) > - return; > + goto out_unlock; > > /* find and pin the new wb */ > rcu_read_lock(); > @@ -511,12 +539,14 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs(struct inod > * Let's continue after I_WB_SWITCH is guaranteed to be visible. > */ > call_rcu(&isw->rcu_head, inode_switch_wbs_rcu_fn); > - return; > + goto out_unlock; > > out_free: > if (isw->new_wb) > wb_put(isw->new_wb); > kfree(isw); > +out_unlock: > + up_read(&bdi->wb_switch_rwsem); > } > > /** > @@ -893,6 +923,9 @@ fs_initcall(cgroup_writeback_init); > > #else /* CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK */ > > +static void bdi_down_write_wb_switch_rwsem(struct backing_dev_info *bdi) { } > +static void bdi_up_write_wb_switch_rwsem(struct backing_dev_info *bdi) { } > + > static struct bdi_writeback * > locked_inode_to_wb_and_lock_list(struct inode *inode) > __releases(&inode->i_lock) > @@ -2422,8 +2455,11 @@ void sync_inodes_sb(struct super_block * > return; > WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&sb->s_umount)); > > + /* protect against inode wb switch, see inode_switch_wbs_work_fn() */ > + bdi_down_write_wb_switch_rwsem(bdi); > bdi_split_work_to_wbs(bdi, &work, false); > wb_wait_for_completion(bdi, &done); > + bdi_up_write_wb_switch_rwsem(bdi); > > wait_sb_inodes(sb); > } > --- a/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h > +++ b/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h > @@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ struct backing_dev_info { > #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK > struct radix_tree_root cgwb_tree; /* radix tree of active cgroup wbs */ > struct rb_root cgwb_congested_tree; /* their congested states */ > + struct rw_semaphore wb_switch_rwsem; /* no cgwb switch while syncing */ > #else > struct bdi_writeback_congested *wb_congested; > #endif > --- a/mm/backing-dev.c > +++ b/mm/backing-dev.c > @@ -706,6 +706,7 @@ static int cgwb_bdi_init(struct backing_ > > INIT_RADIX_TREE(&bdi->cgwb_tree, GFP_ATOMIC); > bdi->cgwb_congested_tree = RB_ROOT; > + init_rwsem(&bdi->wb_switch_rwsem); > > ret = wb_init(&bdi->wb, bdi, 1, GFP_KERNEL); > if (!ret) { -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
