Re: [v10 3/6] mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu 05-10-17 15:02:18, David Rientjes wrote:
[...]
> I would need to add patches to add the "evaluate as a whole but do not 
> kill all" knob and a knob for "oom priority" so that userspace has the 
> same influence over a cgroup based comparison that it does with a process 
> based comparison to meet business goals.

I do not think 2 knobs would be really necessary for your usecase. If we
allow priorities on non-leaf memcgs then a non 0 priority on such a
memcg would mean that we have to check the cumulative consumption. You
can safely use kill all knob on top of that if you need.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux