On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 05:41:31PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:27:55PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > The following patch was sent a while back by Wolfgang Bumiller to remap cpusets > > for a whole subtree in a cgroup v1 cpuset hierarchy. The fact that currently > > this is not possible in a non-racy why is a pretty big limitation. This is > > especially true for nested containers. Where the nested containers often create > > additional subcgroups in the cpuset controller at will. The fact that you can't > > *easily* and in a non-racy way tighten the restriction on them after having > > created the parent container's cpuset cgroup seems really troubling. > > There was a recent patch to enable v2 behavior on v1, which feels like > the better approach at this point. I'm not sure about adding a whole > new interface for this. Cool. If it can be done easier and less invasive I'm all for it. Did the patch already make it into your branch and - only if you happen to have the reference flying around - could you point me to it. Thanks! Christian > > Thanks. > > -- > tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
