Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: refactor mem_cgroup_resize_limit()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 11:09:42PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 01:04:37PM -0700, Yu Zhao wrote:
> > @@ -2498,22 +2449,24 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		mutex_lock(&memcg_limit_mutex);
> > -		if (limit < memcg->memory.limit) {
> > +		inverted = memsw ? limit < memcg->memory.limit :
> > +				   limit > memcg->memsw.limit;
> > +		if (inverted)
> >  			mutex_unlock(&memcg_limit_mutex);
> >  			ret = -EINVAL;
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> 
> For some reason, I liked this patch more without this extra variable :-)
Well, I'll refrain myself from commenting more because we are now at
the risk of starting a coding style war over this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux