RE: [PATCH 0/2] mm/memcontrol: fix reclaim bugs in mem_cgroup_iter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri 28-04-17 14:55:45, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > This patch set contains two bug fixes for mem_cgroup_iter().  The bugs
> > were found by code inspection and were confirmed via synthetic testing
> > that forcefully setup the failing conditions.
> 
> I assume that you added some artificial sleeps to make those races more
> probable, right? Or did you manage to hit those issue solely from the
> userspace? I will have a look at those patches. It has been some time
> since I've had it cached. It is pretty subtle code so I would like to
> understand the urgency before I dive into this further.
> -- 
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs

The code to prove the bugs is completely artificial, it's basically a
unit test for mem_cgroup_iter() that uses a thread barrier to all but
guarantee two threads will call mem_cgroup_iter() simultaneously.  I
haven't even attempted to hit this via the actual userspace flow.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux