Hello,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 12:19:01PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> @@ -134,10 +135,13 @@ static inline void put_css_set(struct css_set *cset)
> * can see it. Similar to atomic_dec_and_lock(), but for an
> * rwlock
> */
> - if (atomic_add_unless(&cset->refcount, -1, 1))
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&css_set_lock, flags);
> + if (refcount_read(&cset->refcount) != 1) {
> + WARN_ON(refcount_dec_and_test(&cset->refcount));
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&css_set_lock, flags);
> return;
> + }
This isn't an equivalent conversion and should have been mentioned in
the patch description. Hmm... and I'm not sure this is a good idea.
Can't we add the matching operation on refcount_t rather than adding
extra locking like this?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
