On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 15:47 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:07:16AM -0800, Paul Turner wrote: > > The only case that this does not support vs ".threads" would be some > > hybrid where we co-mingle threads from different processes (with the > > processes belonging to the same node in the hierarchy). I'm not aware > > of any usage that looks like this. > > If I understand you right; this is a fairly common thing with RT where > we would stuff all the !rt threads of the various processes in a 'misc' > bucket. > > Similarly, it happens that we stuff the various rt threads of processes > in a specific (shared) 'rt' bucket. > > So I would certainly not like to exclude that setup. Absolutely, you just described my daily bread performance setup. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
