On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 08:00:06PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 04:33:23PM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote: > > So my opinion is: > > (a) Let cgroup define the current standard objects and new reasonable > > set of vendor specific objects in future. > > (b) Add new rdma.percentage parameter so that any new standard object > > or vendor specific object can be abstracted from average end user and > > applications which are yet to catch up. > > I believe this takes care of your point (1), (3), (4)? > > We (Tejun, Christoph, Matan and me) had a face-to-face talk during > KS/LPC and decided that the best way to move forward is to export to > user one object (global HCA like) only and don't export anything else. > > All internal calculations will be based on this percentage. In order to simplify for users and developers more, this global cgroup object should be not based on percentage, but on actual number of objects units. While declaration of object unit is object which consumes IDR. The IDR consumers can be of any type. Such simplification will give excellent scalability to the cgroup without sacrificing user experience. > > Once the cgroups users will come with reasonable justification why they > need to configure different unexposed objects, we will expose them.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
