On Sep 16, 2016 12:51 AM, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 01:08:07PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > BTW, Mike keeps mentioning exclusive cgroups as problematic with the > > no-internal-tasks constraints. Do exclusive cgroups still exist in > > cgroup2? Could we perhaps just remove that capability entirely? I've > > never understood what problem exlusive cpusets and such solve that > > can't be more comprehensibly solved by just assigning the cpusets the > > normal inclusive way. > > Without exclusive sets we cannot split the sched_domain structure. > Which leads to not being able to actually partition things. That would > break DL for one. Can you sketch out a toy example? And what's DL? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
