Hello, On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 06:07:30PM +0300, Matan Barak wrote: > Currently, there are some discussions regarding the RDMA ABI. The current > proposed approach (after a lot of discussions in the OFVWG) is to have > driver dependent object types rather than the fixed set of IB object types > we have today. > AFAIK, some vendors might want to use the RDMA subsystem for a different > fabrics which has a different set of objects. > You could see RFCs for such concepts both from Mellanox and Intel on the > linux-rdma mailing list. > > Saying that, maybe we need to make the resource types a bit more flexible > and dynamic. That'd be back to square one and Christoph was dead against it too, so... Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
