Re: [PATCH v2] cgroup: disable irqs while holding css_set_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 09:12:32PM -0300, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> The use of the irq spin_(un)lock_irq() assumes that the code is always
> called with IRQs enabled. But that is not always true in this case, as
> we call cgroup_free() in the hard IRQ context, and unconditionally
> enable IRQ in this context is a problem. So we need to use irqsave/restore.
> 
> Discussing with rostedt, we figured that this needs to be IRQ safe
> (using irqsave/restore) in the PREEMPT RT too, so I need to code a v3 of
> this patch using raw_spin_*() functions to avoid this problem in the -rt
> kernel as well.
> 
> Do you see any problems on this?

Use of raw_spin is fine but I don't see how, say, rebind_subsystems()
or cgroup_setup_root() can ever be called with irq disabled given that
they assume sleepable context.  Please use _irq and _irqsave
appropriately depending on the circumstances.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux