Re: [PATCH] cgroup: Fix misspelling of CONFIG_SOCK_CGROUP_DATA in comments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 04:14:30PM +0100, Andreas Ziegler wrote:
> On 01/26/2016 16:08, Rosen, Rami wrote:
> > Hi, 
> > 
> > --- a/include/linux/cgroup.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> > @@ -604,11 +604,11 @@ static inline struct cgroup *sock_cgroup_ptr(struct sock_cgroup_data *skcd)
> >  #endif
> >  }
> > 
> > In this occasion, seems that maybe something else is also missing:
> > Shouldn't it be hereafter : +#else /* !CONFIG_SOCK_CGROUP_DATA */ 
> > instead ? 
> >    
> > -#else	/* CONFIG_CGROUP_DATA */
> > +#else	/* CONFIG_SOCK_CGROUP_DATA */
> 
> It seems that there is no real consensus among the developers for that
> particular case:
> 
> ziegler@box:~/linux$ git grep "#else \/\* \!CONFIG_" | wc -l
> 327
> ziegler@box:~/linux$ git grep "#else \/\* CONFIG_" | wc -l
> 564

The comments after #ifdef, #ifndef, #else, #endif name the condition
that is being branched on, not the condition that is in effect after
a specific line. Case in point: #endif /* CONFIG_SOCK_CGROUP_DATA */

Stick with the majority, and save a byte!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux