Hello, Parav. On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:16:59AM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote: > Let me think through it. Its been late night for me currently. So dont > want to conclude in hurry. Sure thing. > At high level it looks doable by maintaining hash table head on per > device basis, that further reduces hash contention by one level. > I will get back on this tomorrow. Hmmm... why would it need a hash table? Let's say there's a struct rdma_device for each rdma_device and then that stuct can simply have rdma_device->res_table[] or whatever to track limits and consumptions and rdma_device->res_enabled mask to tell which resources are enabled on the device. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
