Hello, David. On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:17:08PM -0700, David Ahern wrote: > None of the existing subsystems are relevant for configuring an L3 > networking domain, and it does not make sense to tie net_cls and net_prio to > an L3 domain. I don't have an answer for that but cgroup isn't a place to put such stray configurations either. Please figure out where the configuration belongs first. What you're proposing really isn't a resource controller. There's no resource being distributed hierarchically. It's just dumping configuration which hasn't found its proper place into cgroup. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
