On Thu 05-11-15 17:52:00, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 03:55:22PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 03:40:02PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > This would be true if they moved on to the new cgroup API intentionally. > > > The reality is more complicated though. AFAIK sysmted is waiting for > > > cgroup2 already and privileged services enable all available resource > > > controllers by default as I've learned just recently. > > > > Have you filed a report with them? I don't think they should turn them > > on unless users explicitely configure resource control for the unit. > > Okay, verified with systemd people that they're not planning on > enabling resource control per default. > > Inflammatory half-truths, man. This is not constructive. What about Delegate=yes feature then? We have just been burnt by this quite heavily. AFAIU nspawn@.service and nspawn@.service have this enabled by default http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-commits/2014-November/007400.html -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
