Does it make sense for the PIDs controller to allow a user to set a limit of 0? Since we don't cancel attaches, a limit of 0 doesn't affect anything (nothing stops attaches, and you need to have a process in the PIDs cgroup in order for fork()s to be affected by the limit). So I think that attempting to set pid.limit to 0 should return an -EINVAL. -- Aleksa Sarai (cyphar) www.cyphar.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
