Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: Implement interface for cgroup unified hierarchy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Paul Turner <pjt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Anyways, a point here is that threads of the same process competing
> > isn't a new problem.  There are many ways to make those threads play
> > nice as the application itself often has to be involved anyway,
> > especially for something like qemu which is heavily involved in
> > provisioning resources.
> 
> It's certainly not a new problem, but it's a real one, and it's
> _hard_.  You're proposing removing the best known solution.

Also, just to make sure this is resolved properly, I'm NAK-ing the current 
scheduler bits in this series:

  NAKed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>

until all of pjt's API design concerns are resolved. This is conceptual, it is not 
a 'we can fix it later' detail.

Tejun, please keep me Cc:-ed to future versions of this series so that I can lift 
the NAK if things get resolved.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux