Re: [PATCH v10 1/4] cgroups: use bitmask to filter for_each_subsys

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey,

>> > >  static struct cftype cgroup_dfl_base_files[];
>> > > +#define for_each_subsys_which(ss_mask, ss, ssid) \
>> > > + for_each_subsys((ss), (ssid)) \
>> > > +         if ((ss_mask) & (1 << (ssid)))
>> >
>> > Maybe using for_each_set_bit() is better?
>> >
>> > #define for_each_subsys_which(ss_mask, ss, ssid)            \
>> >     for_each_set_bit(ssid, &(ss_mask), CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT) \
>> >             if ((ss) = group_subsys[ssid] && false)         \
>> >                     ;                                       \
>> >             else
>>
>> Clever that ;-)
>
> Thanks.  It kinda bothers me that for_each_set_bit() doesn't collapse
> to combo of ffs() + clearing bit off of a temp mask when size is const
> and <= ulong, which would be quite a bit lighter.  Right now it'd be
> calling into generic find_first/next_bit() functions unconditionally.
> Ah well, it can be optimized later.

This macro causes issues with lines like:
   for_each_subsys_which(ss, ssid, ~cgrp_dfl_root_inhibit_ss_mask)

In addition, there are a bunch of cgroup_* functions that use unsigned
ints for bitops (cgroup_calc_child_subsys_mask, rebind_subsystems,
cgroup_print_ss_mask). Is there a better solution to this problem, or
should I just switch back to my naive solution?

--
Aleksa Sarai (cyphar)
www.cyphar.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux