On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 06:35:41AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote: > >> Do you also want me to completely drop the COUNT macro? IMO it makes > >> the CGROUP_<TAG>_COUNT consolidation much nicer. > > > > What's wrong with simply having start and end tags? > > Because you'd have to write (CGROUP_TAG_END - CGROUP_TAG_START) every > time? It's a small addition and it makes referencing the range of a > tagged section much easier. Wouldn't loops look more like for (subsys = CGROUP_TAG_START; subsys < CGROUP_TAG_END; subsys++) And even if not, just define a separate macro for the length. It's not like we're gonna have a lot of tags. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
