Re: [PATCH v8 3/4] cgroups: allow a cgroup subsystem to reject a fork

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, Tejun.

>> +struct cgroup_fork_state {
>> +     void *ss_state[CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT];
>> +};
>
> Can we collect the subsystems which require pre/post fork callbacks to
> the front in group_subsys.h and do do CGROUP_SUBSYS_FORK_COUNT (or
> whatever) instead?  Then, we don't need all these subsys bitmasks
> either we can just test the index against that and be done with it.

I tried doing this and the kernel would refuse to boot. I believe it has
something to do with the ordering of early_init subsystems, but I'm not
entirely sure (this optimisation can be dealt with later [it's non-critical],
so IMO this should be done in a separate patchset [if at all]). Also, your
later comments would fix the subsys bitmask problem (we can just pass the
default %NULL), we don't even need to test the index.

--
Aleksa Sarai (cyphar)
www.cyphar.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux