On 03/18/2015 12:47 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 12:12:09PM -0400, riel@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> The previous patch makes it so the code skips over isolcpus when >> building scheduler load balancing domains. This makes it hard to >> see for a user which of the CPUs in a cpuset are participating in >> load balancing, and which ones are isolated cpus. >> >> Add a cpuset.isolcpus file with info on which cpus in a cpuset are >> isolated CPUs. >> >> This file is read-only for now. In the future we could extend things >> so isolcpus can be changed at run time, for the root (system wide) >> cpuset only. > > Didn't Li say that this is trivially computable from userland? I'm > not sure this knob actually belongs to cpuset. Going back through my email, it looks like Li previously acked this patch. That explains why I'm confused about your comment :) -- All rights reversed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
