On 03/02/2015 07:44 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 10:09 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:12:31PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: >>> Subject: cpusets,isolcpus: add file to show isolated cpus in cpuset >>> >>> The previous patch makes it so the code skips over isolcpus when >>> building scheduler load balancing domains. This makes it hard to >>> see for a user which of the CPUs in a cpuset are participating in >>> load balancing, and which ones are isolated cpus. >>> >>> Add a cpuset.isolcpus file with info on which cpus in a cpuset are >>> isolated CPUs. >>> >>> This file is read-only for now. In the future we could extend things >>> so isolcpus can be changed at run time, for the root (system wide) >>> cpuset only. >>> >>> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> So let me start off by saying I hate isolcpus ;-) >> >> Let me further state that I had hopes we could extend cpusets to >> natively provide the functionality isolcpus has, and kill isolcpus. > > +1 > > That's where nohz_full goop belongs too. Except nohz_full and isolcpus are very much global attributes of each CPU, so I am not sure whether it would make sense to allow configuration of this attribute anywhere other than the root cpuset. -- All rights reversed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
