Re: [patch v2 1/3] mm: remove GFP_THISNODE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, David Rientjes wrote:

> +/*
> + * Construct gfp mask to allocate from a specific node but do not invoke reclaim
> + * or warn about failures.
> + */

We should be triggering reclaim from slab allocations. Why would we not do
this?

Otherwise we will be going uselessly off node for slab allocations.

> +static inline gfp_t gfp_exact_node(gfp_t flags)
> +{
> +	return (flags | __GFP_THISNODE | __GFP_NOWARN) & ~__GFP_WAIT;
> +}
>  #endif

Reclaim needs to be triggered. In particular zone reclaim was made to be
triggered from slab allocations to create more room if needed.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux