Re: [patch] mm: memcontrol: default hierarchy interface for memory fix - high reclaim

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 02:25:19PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sat 17-01-15 10:21:19, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > High limit reclaim can currently overscan in proportion to how many
> > charges are happening concurrently.  Tone it down such that charges
> > don't target the entire high-boundary excess, but instead only the
> > pages they charged themselves when excess is detected.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I certainly agree with this approach.
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>

Thanks!

> Is this planned to be folded into the original patch or go on its own. I
> am OK with both ways, maybe having it separate would be better from
> documentation POV.

I submitted them to be folded in.  Which aspect would you like to see
documented?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

  Powered by Linux