Am 06.01.2015 um 01:10 schrieb Aditya Kali: > Since the old/default behavior is on its way out, I didn't invest time > in fixing that. Also, some of the properties that make > cgroup-namespace simpler are only provided by unified hierarchy (for > example: a single root-cgroup per container). Does the new sane cgroupfs behavior even have a single real world user? I always thought it isn't stable yet. Linux distros currently use systemd v210. They don't dare to use a newer one. Even *if* systemd would support the sane sane cgroupfs behavior in the most recent version it will take 1-2 years until it would hit a recent distro. So please support also the old and nasty behavior such that one day we can run current systemd distros in Linux containers. Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
