Hi tj. On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 07:32:10PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote: >> Currently, the only method to detach a task from a cgroup is moving >> it to others. It looks not natrual to me. > > Ummm... how is this different from moving it to the root cgroup? > "just because" usually isn't a good enough rationale. > Thanx for your reply :). My point here is that attaching and detaching are a pair of operations. And the things involved in these operations should be a process and a cgroup. But currently, when we want to detach a process from a cgroup (A), we have to attach it to another cgroup (B). I think it is not easy to understand. People would say: "Why I want to detach a process from A, I have to care about another cgroup." So I created this patch here wanting to make these operations more easy to understand. And make attaching and detaching to be antonymous in action. I think maybe we can use it in the Cgroup V2 which is in developing. :) That's all my reason for this patch. But you could think it makes no sense. It's okey to me. Thanx > Thanks. > > -- > tejun > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
