On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 03:10:17PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: [..] > At this point I think journald people need to give a little bit more > details on how they plan to use SO_PASSCGROUP. > > For my use cases I care only about streams and SO_PEERCGROUP that does > not have any of the (perceived) issues of SO_PASSCGROUP. Ok, so we agree that SO_PEERCGROUP is not a problem. And it solves the problem for some of the use cases. And there is lot of contention on the SO_PASSCGROUP option. So how about taking one step at a time. Get SO_PEERCGROUP in first and then get into more details on how SO_PASSCGROUP will exactly be used and then decide what to do. Thanks Vivek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
